|
Department of Pediatrics > Home > A Letter From Dr. Dana Johnson > New Kids, New Challenges
New Kids, New Challenges
International Adoption--Why and from Where? The number of international adoptions in the United States has increased by 10% each year since 19921. Reasons for this include: a shortage of adoptable children in the U.S. with the most desired characteristics (race and age); real or perceived uncertainties inherent in domestic adoption (failure of birthparents to relinquish rights); and, ironically, fear of adopting a “special needs” child. With increased interest in adopting internationally and traditional placement countries such as Korea decreasing the number of children available, new countries such as China and Russia have become the source of the majority of children placed with American families.
Change in the Child Care Environment Along with changes in countries of origin, a dramatic change has occurred in the level of care received by international adoptees prior to arrival in the U.S. Ten years ago, two-thirds of adoptees came from Korea, a country with a high standard of living where children were cared for in foster homes and had access to excellent health care. Now, more than two-thirds of the children come from institutional care settings in countries where per capita income is low and appropriate levels of health care and nutrition are difficult to provide. Consequently, the overall health and well being of international adoptees has deteriorated significantly.
Assessing the Health Needs of a Child from Afar International adoption is an expensive, emotionally draining and time-consuming process. By the time a family receives a referral, they are desperate to complete the process and have a child in their arms. Adoptive families need to choose children they are capable of parenting. They need to make well-reasoned decisions at a point in their lives when it is difficult to be dispassionate. No one’s best interests will be served if a family accepts the referral of a child whose needs are greater than the family’s ability to provide.2
Evaluation After Arrival A newly adopted child should visit a physician within the first few weeks after arrival—sooner if there appear to be problems. While a medical history, physical examination and laboratory tests are all part of the initial evaluation, in international adoptees the history may be limited or fabricated, and the physical examination rarely identifies the problems common to these children. A battery of screening tests is absolutely necessary to fully evaluate the health of the newly adopted child. Below are the tests recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics and our suggested additions to the list3-6. For further details, consult the 1997 Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics.
Initial Physical Examination: Special Considerations
Growth. Institutionalized children suffer from psychosocial growth retardation (abuse dwarfism), falling behind one month of linear growth for each three to four months spent in the orphanage irrespective of country of origin7-11. After placement in adoptive families, linear growth velocity increases dramatically in almost all children12. In fact, if rapid linear growth is not observed during the first 12, months further investigation is warranted. Despite this growth spurt, three years after arrival, 31% of Romanian orphans who had spent eight months or more within institutional care remained below the tenth percentile in height and were an average of two inches shorter than children raised in their birth families13. Ultimately, final height may be shortened in these children via a combination of prenatal growth deficiency, psychosocial growth retardation and precocious puberty.
Physical and Sexual Abuse. Unfortunately, institutional care settings are a magnet for adults who prey upon children. If physical or sexual abuse of the child within the orphanage is suspected, it is in the child’s and family’s best interests to seek the advise of physicians and therapists who have expertise in this area. Indications for an evaluation may include unexplained scars or bruises, a positive history or x-ray evidence of fractures, genital/rectal scarring or tears, and sexual behavior that is not age appropriate.
Bony Fractures, Physical Abuse and Rickets. Related to the question of physical abuse, it is our observation that a number of Chinese children have arrived with bony fractures. Rickets is a common diagnosis on Chinese medical forms. Our studies have confirmed that the older a Chinese child is on arrival, the greater the risk of rickets8. Thus, fractures may be due to this nutritional disorder as well as abuse. Any child who arrives with bony deformities, swelling or tenderness should be evaluated for fractures and rickets. Not only is this important in terms of the child's well-being, it is important for the adoptive family's safety to document that these fractures occurred prior to the child's arrival in their home.
Immunizations. We have recently found that approximately 60% of children who were reported to have received three or more DPT/OPV vaccines in China, Russia or Eastern Europe have no antibodies to these diseases. This means that either the vaccines used were outdated or improperly stored, the child lacked an appropriate immunologic response after vaccination, or the vaccination certificate is fraudulent.
We recommend testing for diphtheria and tetanus antibodies in any child who has reportedly received three or more DPT vaccines. If antibodies are absent or low, or if the child has received fewer than three DPT vaccines, we would advocate starting the immunization sequence over again according to the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for children not immunized in the first year of life (1997 Red Book, Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL, 1997, p. 22).
Common Post-arrival Issues
Transitional Problems
- Feeding (gorging, hoarding, preoccupation with going to the grocery store or with what is in the refrigerator)
- Sleeping (not used to sleeping alone, fear of sexual abuse, fear of abandonment)
- Emotional decompensation when faced with situations that mimic terrifying events from the past
Language Expressive language is always behind in institutionalized children. Speech evaluation is recommended for all institutionalized children above the age of 18 to 24 months within the first few months of arrival.
Attachment Indiscrimate friendliness may pose safety issues.
Sensory Integration Difficulties
- Touch (adverse response to clothing and food [particularly meat] textures, bathing, hugging/kissing)
- Hearing, vision, taste and smell (hyper- or hyposensitive)
- Self-stimulation (rocking, head banging, masturbation)
- Pain (usually hyposensitive to pain, unaware they are injured)
- Kinesthetic (clumsy, injury prone)
Easing the Transition from Orphanage to Family
- Structure, structure, structure: institutionalized children respond adversely to uncertainty
- Maximize parent-child interactions, especially reading and holding; activities should be adjusted to fit the developmental state--not chronologic age--of the child
- Limit contact with individuals outside family
- Encourage structured interactions with other children when parent is present
- Avoid overstimulation
- Tolerate bizarre behaviors as long as they pose no safety risks--they usually diminish with time
- Seek help early--avoid making excuses to explain delays
Outcome in Institutionalized Children
Intellectual development. By one year of age, virtually all institutionalized children are behind in at least one, if not all, areas of development. However, most children make rapid progress during the first years after arrival, with average increases of two developmental quotient points per month. After three years of age, the length of time in the orphanage and delays at 11 months correlate negatively with IQ scores. In children who spent at least eight months within institutional care, mean overall IQ was 90, with a range from 65 to 127 (n=31). In children who spent two years or more within institutional care, mean overall IQ was 69, with a range from 52 to 98 (n=12).
Attachment
- Low attachment scores were seen on arrival and fewer children formed secure attachment relationships; one-third displayed atypical, insecure attachment patterns, particularly those children with lower IQ's, more behavior problems and families with lower socioeconomic status
- More indiscriminately friendly
Behavior
- Initially internalizing behavior--failure to make needs known, stereotyped behavior
- Evolves into externalizing behavior--aggressive, antisocial, under-controlled, rageful, oppositional
Social Behavior
- Hostile and aggressive
- Distractible
- Poorly controlled
- Hyperactive
- Poor attention span
Overall Outcome Three Years+ After Arrival of Children Who Spent Eight Months or More in Institutional Care
- Thirty percent have several serious problems (IQ is less than or equal to 85, atypical insecure attachment, severe behavior problems, ongoing stereotyped behavior)
- Thirty-five percent have a few serious problems but are making progress
- Thirty-five percent have made wonderful progress
Predictors of Major Problems Three Years+ After Arrival
- Length of time in the orphanage
- Number of children adopted
- Younger adoptive mother
- Lower socioeconomic status of mother
- Father alone selected child
References
1. Guide to Adoption. Adoptive Families of America: St. Paul, MN, 1997, pp 10-11. 2. Hostetter MK, Johnson DE. International Adoption: An introduction for physicians. Am J Dis Child 143:325-332, 1989. 3. Hostetter MK, Iverson SI, Dole K, Johnson DE. Unsuspected infectious diseases and other medical diagnoses in the evaluation of internationally adopted children. Pediatrics 83:559-564, 1989. 4. Hostetter MK, Iverson SI, Thomas W, McKenzie D, Dole K, Johnson DE. Prospective Medical evaluation of internationally adopted children. N Engl J Med 325: 479-485, 1991. 5. Hostetter, MK, Johnson DE. Medical examination of the internationally adopted child. Postgrad Med, 99:70-82, 1996. 6. Johnson DE, Hostetter MK. Medical supervision in internationally adopted children. Pediatric Basics, 1996. 7. Johnson DE, Miller LC, Iverson SI, Thomas W, Franchino B, Dole K, Kiernan MB, Georgieff MK, Hostetter MK. The health of children adopted from Romania. JAMA 268:3446-3451, 1992. 8. Johnson DE, Traister M, Iverson SI, Dole K, Hostetter MK, Miller LC. Health Status of US adopted Chinese orphans. Pediatr Res 39:135A, 1996. 9. Johnson DE, Albers LH, Iverson SI, Mathers M, Dole K, Georgieff MK, Hostetter MK, Miller LC. Health status of US adopted Eastern European orphans. Pediatr Res 39:134A, 1996. 10. Johnson DE, Albers LH, Iverson SI, Mathers M, Dole K, Georgieff MK, Hostetter MK, Miller LC. Health status of Eastern European orphans referred for adoption. Pediatr Res 39:134A, 1996. 11. Albers LH, Johnson DE, Hostetter MK, Iverson SI, Georgieff MK, Miller LC. Health of children adopted from the former Societ Union and Eastern Europe: Comparison with pre-adoptive medical records. JAMA 278:922-924, 1997. 12. Johnson DE, Miller LC, Iverson SI, Thomas W, Franchino B, Dole K, Kiernan MT, Georgieff MK, Hostetter MK. Post-placement catch-up growth in Romanian orphans with psychosocial short stature. Pediatr Res 33:89A, 1993. 13. Ames E, et al. The development of Romanian orphanage children adopted to Canada. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6. Contact author at elinor_ames@sfu.ca or (604) 983- 9317. 14. Marcovitch E, et al. Determinants of behavioral problems in Romanian children adopted in Ontario. Int J Behav Dev 20:17-31, 1997. 15. Fisher L, et al. Problems reported by parents of Romanian orphans adopted to British Columbia. Int J Behav Dev 20:67-82, 1997. 16. Sloutsky V. Institutional care and developmental outcomes of 6- and 7-year-old children: a contextualist perspective. Int J Behav Dev 20:1310151, 1997.
|
Feedback | Notice of Privacy Practices
|
|
|